A critical vulnerability in Microsoft’s M365 Copilot allowed users to access sensitive files without generating proper audit log entries, creating significant compliance and security risks for organizations worldwide.
Despite classifying the issue as “important,” Microsoft has chosen not to publicly disclose the vulnerability or notify affected customers, raising serious concerns about transparency in enterprise security communications.
Vulnerability Details and Technical Impact
The vulnerability, discovered on July 4th by cybersecurity researcher Zack Korman, exploited a fundamental flaw in Copilot’s audit logging mechanism.
Under normal operations, when M365 Copilot summarizes a file, the system generates corresponding audit log entries documenting the file access.
However, researchers found that by simply instructing Copilot to omit file links from its responses, the audit logging functionality would fail.
This bypass technique proved remarkably simple to execute, requiring no specialized technical knowledge or sophisticated attack vectors.
Users could inadvertently trigger the vulnerability through routine interactions with Copilot, making it a widespread issue rather than an isolated exploit.
The ease of exploitation means that organizational audit logs using Copilot before August 18th are potentially incomplete and unreliable.
Microsoft Security Response Center Process Failures
The vulnerability disclosure process revealed significant deficiencies in Microsoft’s Security Response Center (MSRC) procedures.
Despite published guidelines outlining clear vulnerability handling protocols, Microsoft deviated substantially from its documented process without communication.
| Timeline Phase | Expected MSRC Process | Actual Microsoft Response |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Report | Acknowledge and reproduce | Changed status without explanation |
| Investigation | Maintain “reproducing” status | Refused CVE, citing automatic deployment |
| Classification | Transparent severity assessment | Withheld classification until questioned |
| CVE Assignment | Issue CVE for important vulnerabilities | Refused CVE citing automatic deployment |
| Customer Notification | Coordinate disclosure timeline | No plans for customer notification |
The company initially justified withholding a CVE number by claiming automatic deployment negated the need for customer action.
When challenged on this policy deviation, MSRC representatives suggested the researcher lacked understanding of their internal processes, despite clear contradictions with published policies.
Compliance and Legal Implications
The vulnerability creates substantial risks for organizations subject to regulatory compliance requirements.
Healthcare entities relying on HIPAA technical safeguards, financial institutions under SOX compliance, and government contractors with audit trail requirements may have unknowingly operated with compromised logging systems.
Microsoft’s decision to implement silent fixes without customer notification prevents organizations from conducting proper risk assessments or investigating potential security incidents.
This approach undermines the fundamental principle of audit log integrity that many compliance frameworks require.
Microsoft’s handling of this vulnerability demonstrates concerning patterns in enterprise security transparency.
Organizations that deployed M365 Copilot before August 18th should assume their audit logs may be incomplete and conduct comprehensive security reviews accordingly.
The incident highlights the critical need for clear vulnerability disclosure policies that prioritize customer security over corporate reputation management.
Find this Story Interesting! Follow us on LinkedIn and X to Get More Instant Updates
%20(1).webp?resize=1600,900&ssl=1&description=Despite classifying the issue as "important," Microsoft has chosen not to publicly disclose the vulnerability or notify affected customers){kind=link}