A threat actor operating under the alias “EduLeakHunter” has claimed responsibility for a data breach targeting an India-based online education platform, advertising 426,000 user records for sale on the dark web for $500.
The leaked dataset allegedly includes full names, email addresses, phone numbers, transactional payment histories, and records of user participation in virtual educational events.
While the platform’s identity remains unconfirmed, cybersecurity analysts warn the incident reflects persistent vulnerabilities in India’s rapidly digitizing education sector, which has suffered multiple high-profile breaches since 2020.
Scope and Technical Details of the Alleged Breach
According to dark web monitoring firm Resecurity HUNTER, the threat actor shared sample data containing user registration timestamps, course enrollment details, and partial payment card information.

The dataset’s structure suggests attackers exploited an unsecured application programming interface (API) endpoint or compromised a cloud storage bucket, tactics previously observed in breaches involving platforms like Unacademy (2020) and Diksha (2023).
The seller claims to have exfiltrated 22 terabytes of data, though only a fraction is currently monetized.
Cybersecurity experts caution that even limited Personally Identifiable Information (PII) exposure enables identity theft, credential stuffing attacks, and targeted phishing campaigns.
“Transactional records paired with event participation data create a roadmap for social engineering,” said a Bitdefender analyst.
“Attackers can impersonate trusted institutions to harvest additional financial data or deploy ransomware.”
India’s Education Sector Under Siege
This incident aligns with a broader trend of cyberattacks targeting Indian educational platforms, particularly those scaling operations during the COVID-19 pandemic’s remote learning surge.
In 2020, Unacademy—a Bengaluru-based edtech unicorn—suffered a breach exposing 22 million user accounts via an unsecured database, with records later sold for $2,000.
Similarly, the government-operated Diksha app leaked 1.6 million teachers’ PII through misconfigured AWS S3 buckets in 2023.
Globally, education institutions face heightened risks due to decentralized IT infrastructures and underinvestment in cybersecurity.
The 2022 ransomware attack on the Los Angeles Unified School District, which exposed 500 GB of sensitive student psychological assessments and employee tax forms, underscores the sector’s vulnerability.
Technical Analysis and Mitigation Strategies
Initial forensic indicators suggest the attackers bypassed authentication protocols using SQL injection or leveraged stolen API keys.
The presence of event participation data implies database queries targeted user activity logs, potentially exposing behavioral patterns.
Resecurity notes the threat actor utilized AES-256 encryption for data storage but employed weak key management practices, enabling decryption.
To mitigate risks, users should:
- Reset passwords using PBKDF2-SHA256 hashing algorithms, as implemented by Unacademy post-breach.
- Enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all educational platform accounts.
- Monitor financial statements for unauthorized transactions linked to exposed payment histories.
python# Example of secure password hashing using PBKDF2-SHA256
import hashlib
salt = b'salt_value'
password = b'user_password'
key = hashlib.pbkdf2_hmac('sha256', password, salt, 100000)
Regulatory Implications and Sector-Wide Challenges
India’s draft Digital Personal Data Protection Act (2023) mandates breach notifications within 72 hours, but enforcement remains inconsistent.
The Diksha breach, for instance, saw no official response from the Ministry of Education despite researchers’ alerts.
Legal experts argue the lack of transparency—exemplified by schools withholding breach details under attorney-client privilege—exacerbates risks.
As edtech platforms expand, integrating Zero Trust architectures and conducting regular penetration tests will be critical.
Until then, the sector’s $10.4 billion market valuation risks erosion from reputational damage and regulatory penalties.
Also Read: