A recent bug bounty engagement has brought to light a critical OAuth2 misconfiguration that allowed independent security researchers to access sensitive organizational and personally identifiable information (PII) without restriction.
The flaw, uncovered during a YesWeHack program, stemmed from the inadvertent exposure of OAuth client credentials within an unauthenticated API endpoint-an oversight that ultimately enabled attackers to escalate privileges and retrieve confidential business and user data.
The researcher began by systematically probing the web application as an unauthenticated user, leveraging fundamental reconnaissance techniques such as traffic interception via Burp Suite or Caido.
By carefully reviewing JavaScript files and monitoring asynchronous XHR and fetch requests, the researcher detected an endpoint, /api/v1/configuration, that unwittingly disclosed both clientId and clientSecret.
This information, critical to OAuth2’s Client Credentials Grant flow, is supposed to remain private and is typically never exposed to client-side components.
OAuth2, a widely adopted authorization framework, relies on secure exchanges between applications and authorization servers.
Misconfigurations like exposed credentials compromise its security guarantees, especially in workflows where the application acts on its own behalf rather than on behalf of an individual user.
In this scenario, the researcher identified the authorization server’s token issuance endpoint and used the exposed credentials to successfully request an access token, receiving a bearer token with expansive access privileges.
Lax API Controls Result in Mass Data Access
Armed with this token, the researcher targeted sensitive API endpoints, appending both the static API key and the bearer token in request headers.
The APIs responded with highly sensitive PII such as names, email addresses, phone numbers, and organization-specific business data, confirming the severity of the misconfiguration.
A further lack of rate limiting allowed the researcher to automate API requests, effectively brute-forcing ID parameters and extracting mass records of confidential information.
While destructive actions like data modification or deletion were avoided for ethical and program-compliance reasons, the unrestricted “read” access alone demonstrated the grave consequences of improper OAuth credential management.
This incident highlights the importance of securing configuration APIs and meticulously scoping sensitive credentials within distributed web architectures, especially as organizations increasingly rely on third-party services and no-code/low-code platforms.
According to the Report, The researcher’s methodical approach-eschewing over-reliance on automated tools in favor of careful manual analysis and session traffic review-illustrates best practices for both offensive security assessments and defensive posture reviews.
The findings underscore the necessity of layered access control, stringent credential handling, and proactive monitoring of API boundary exposures.
The case underscores that even minor information disclosures-when combined with incorrect assumptions about API scoping-can quickly escalate into critical system-wide vulnerabilities.
Developers, security teams, and bug bounty participants alike must prioritize holistic application understanding, rigorously validate the permissions and exposure of authentication tokens, and avoid complacency with generic automated scanning.
Responsible disclosure, transparent communication with affected organizations, and a clear, actionable reporting style further reinforce the collaborative nature of effective web security.
Find this Story Interesting! Follow us on LinkedIn and X to Get More Instant updates
