As Android security continues to change quickly, privilege escalation has emerged as a complex issue that goes much beyond conventional exploit-based attacks.
Emerging evidence shows a significant, yet underappreciated, threat: applications leveraging excessive system-level permissions via legitimate channels, particularly through Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) permissions and sideloaded apps.
Manufacturers’ Hidden Permissions
While much of the security community’s attention is focused on thwarting obvious exploits, sophisticated threat actors are capitalizing on architectural nuances of the Android ecosystem.
Specifically, they exploit the elevated permissions granted to OEM and pre-installed apps privileges embedded deeply within device firmware and often invisible to end users and standard protection mechanisms.
According to Zimperium Report, these privileges, designed to facilitate seamless user experiences and device management, can inadvertently create opportunities for malicious escalation.
When applications, particularly those sideloaded or pre-installed, request combinations of permissions such as access to system settings, hardware control, and cross-user data, they can achieve a cumulative level of access that far exceeds their apparent functionality.
For example, utility apps requesting permissions for overlays, accessibility services, and secure settings are frequently given broad latitude, which, if abused, can lead to credential theft, unauthorized transactions, and surveillance.
OEM permissions are particularly concerning. Device manufacturers may issue proprietary permissions such as SECURITY, HW_CONTROL, or INTERACT_ACROSS_USERS_FULL which bypass standard Android security controls.
Threat actors have been observed abusing these in various scenarios: impersonating system apps, exploiting compromised but legitimate applications, or aggregating multiple permissions to circumvent protections.
The vague documentation and lack of visibility regarding OEM permissions further complicate detection and mitigation efforts.
App Vetting and Accessibility Features
App vetting emerges as a critical defense layer in this context. Robust vetting must thoroughly analyze both static (manifest-declared) and dynamic (runtime) permissions.
Many enterprise environments now employ solutions capable of inspecting code, monitoring network behavior, and simulating execution to identify privilege abuse especially with permissions like SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW, ACCESSIBILITY_SERVICE, and WRITE_SECURE_SETTINGS.
The accessibility API, in particular, is a powerful resource intended for users with disabilities but frequently targeted by malware to read on-screen content, automate interactions, and steal sensitive data.
Google has responded by introducing “Restricted Settings” on newer Android versions, limiting which sideloaded apps can use the accessibility API, and intensifying reviews on Google Play.
Despite these efforts, attackers are adapting using session-based installations to bypass restrictions or employing “dropper” apps that dynamically load malicious code post-installation.
Pre-installed apps further complicate the threat environment. These applications, embedded by OEMs and often irremovable, possess elevated privileges by design.
Although intended to enhance user experience and facilitate device management, their extensive permissions make them prime targets for exploitation.
Vulnerabilities such as intent redirection, insecure API usage, and improperly protected content providers have surfaced in widely distributed OEM apps, as highlighted by security research and static code analysis.
A notable example involved a flagship device’s “private folder” app, which, due to an intent redirection flaw, allowed attackers to execute privileged actions and exfiltrate sensitive user data without requiring additional permissions or user interaction.
The prevalence of third-party app stores and sideloading practices amplifies these risks.
Malicious actors exploit the lack of oversight, circumventing security policies that would otherwise block privilege escalation attempts.
Studies and threat intelligence feeds consistently report cleaner and utility apps some with millions of downloads operating beyond their declared purposes, dynamically loading malicious payloads and participating in active malware campaigns.
In conclusion, the convergence of OEM-specific permissions, accessibility abuse, and lax vetting especially for sideloaded and pre-installed apps presents a formidable challenge in mobile security.
Addressing this requires a coordinated approach: rigorous vetting processes, improved transparency in permission documentation, rapid vulnerability patching, and user education on the risks of sideloaded and pre-installed applications.
Without these efforts, the threat of privilege escalation will continue to outpace existing defenses, leaving Android users and their data exposed.
Find this Story Interesting! Follow us on LinkedIn and X to Get More Instant Updates
